Legislature(2005 - 2006)

2006-05-08 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2006-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 3880
SB 289                                                                                            
Representative Dahlstrom brought up reconsideration of the vote on                                  
CSSB 289(FIN) (page 3746).                                                                          
                                                                                                    
The following was again before the House in third reading:                                          
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN)                                                                
     "An Act relating to the payment of insurer examination expenses,                               
     to the regulation of managed care insurance plans, to actuarial                                
     opinions and supporting documentation for an insurer, to                                       
     insurance firms, managing general agents, and third-party                                      
     administrators, to eligibility of surplus lines insurers, to prompt                            
     payment of health care insurance claims, to required notice by an                              
     insurer, to individual deferred annuities, to mental health benefits                           
     under a health care insurance plan, to the definitions of 'title                               
     insurance limited producer' and of other terms used in the title                               
     regulating the practice of the business of insurance, and to small                             
     employer health insurance; repealing the Small Employer Health                                 
     Reinsurance Association; making conforming amendments; and                                     
     providing for an effective date."                                                              
                                                                                                    
Representative Dahlstrom moved and asked unanimous consent that                                     
CSSB 289 be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of                                  
considering Amendment No. 5.  There being no objection, it was so                                   
ordered.                                                                                            
                                                                                                    

2006-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 3881
Amendment No. 5 was offered  by Representatives Dahlstrom, Harris,                                   
Lynn, Elkins, LeDoux, Thomas, Foster, and Gruenberg:                                                
                                                                                                    
Page 1, line 9, following "amendments;" (title amendment):                                        
 Insert "establishing a fund for the payment of Servicemembers'                                   
Group Life Insurance premiums and providing for the payment of                                    
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance premiums;"                                                   
                                                                                                    
Page 36, following line 5:                                                                          
 Insert a new bill section to read:                                                                 
   "* Sec. 48. AS 26.05 is amended by adding a new section to read:                               
      Sec. 26.05.263. Payment of Servicemembers' Group Life                                       
     Insurance premiums; establishment of fund. (a) The                                           
     Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance premium fund is                                           
     established as a separate fund in the state treasury. The fund                                 
     consists of appropriations by the legislature to it. Money                                     
     appropriated to the fund does not lapse. The state shall hold the                              
     principal and earnings of the fund for the purpose of reimbursing                              
     eligible members of the Alaska National Guard deployed to a                                    
     combat zone for premiums paid under 38 U.S.C. 1965 - 1980                                      
     (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Program).                                                
         (b)  The adjutant general may make expenditures from the                                   
     fund to reimburse eligible members of the Alaska National Guard                                
     deployed to a combat zone for premiums paid under the program                                  
     during the period of                                                                           
              (1)  deployment if the eligible member applies for                                    
     reimbursement within two years after returning to the state                                    
     following deployment;                                                                          
              (2)  up to one year of convalescence following the return                             
     from deployment; and                                                                           
              (3)  with the approval of the adjutant general, up to one                             
     year of convalescence in addition to the year under (2) of this                                
     subsection.                                                                                    
         (c)  Subject to appropriation, the fund may be used to pay the                             
     expenses incurred by the commissioner of revenue in managing                                   
     the fund and administrative expenses incurred by the Department                                
     of Revenue in administering this section.                                                      
         (d)  Except as provided in (c) of this section, money in the                               
     fund is available for expenditure without further appropriation.                              
          (e)  Nothing in this section creates a dedicated fund.                                   

2006-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 3882
         (f)  The Department of Revenue may adopt regulations                                       
     necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.                                         
         (g)  In this section,                                                                      
              (1)  "combat zone" means an area of hostile fire or                                   
     imminent danger that entitles a member on duty in that area to                                 
     special pay;                                                                                   
              (2)  "convalescence" means hospital, outpatient, or                                   
     rehabilitation treatment for an injury suffered while deployed to a                            
     combat zone;                                                                                   
              (3)  "fund" means the Servicemembers' Group Life                                      
     Insurance premium fund;                                                                        
              (4)  "program" means the Servicemembers' Group Life                                   
     Insurance program established by 38 U.S.C. 1965 - 1980."                                       
                                                                                                    
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.                                                   
                                                                                                    
Page 36, line 12, following "APPLICABILITY.":                                                       
 Insert "(a)"                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
Page 36, following line 13:                                                                         
 Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                   
         "(b)  The reimbursement of premiums paid by members of the                                 
     Alaska National Guard deployed to a combat zone under 38                                       
     U.S.C. 1965 - 1980 (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance                                       
     Program) under AS 26.05.263, enacted in sec. 48 of this Act,                                   
     applies to premiums due on or after January 1, 2005."                                          
                                                                                                    
Page 37, following line 6:                                                                          
 Insert a new bill section to read:                                                                 
   "* Sec. 52. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by                            
adding a new section to read:                                                                       
 RETROACTIVITY. AS 26.05.263, enacted by sec. 48 of this Act,                                       
is retroactive to January 1, 2005, and applies to authorize                                         
reimbursement of premiums paid by eligible Alaska National Guard                                    
members after December 31, 2004."                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Page 36, line 17:                                                                                   
     Delete "sec. 48"                                                                               
     Insert "sec. 49"                                                                               
                                                                                                    

2006-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 3883
Page 37, line 7, following "Sections 26 - 31":                                                      
     Insert "48, and 52"                                                                            
                                                                                                    
Page 37, line 8:                                                                                    
     Delete "Sections 25, 36, and 48"                                                               
     Insert "Sections 25, 36, and 49"                                                               
                                                                                                    
Page 37, line 9:                                                                                    
     Delete "secs. 51 and 52"                                                                       
     Insert "secs. 53 and 54"                                                                       
                                                                                                    
Representative Dahlstrom moved and asked unanimous consent that                                     
Amendment No. 5 be adopted.                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Representative Rokeberg objected.                                                                   
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?"  The roll                                  
was taken with the following result:                                                                
                                                                                                    
CSSB 289(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION                                                                      
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 5                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula,                                  
Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman,                                         
Olson, Ramras, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson                                     
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Rokeberg, Weyhrauch                                                                          
                                                                                                    
And so, Amendment No. 5 was adopted, and the new title follows:                                     
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) am H                                                           
     "An Act relating to the payment of insurer examination expenses,                               
     to the regulation of managed care insurance plans, to actuarial                                
     opinions and supporting documentation for an insurer, to                                       
     insurance firms, managing general agents, and third-party                                      
     administrators, to eligibility of surplus lines insurers, to prompt                            
     payment of health care insurance claims, to required notice by an                              
     insurer, to individual deferred annuities, to mental health benefits                           

2006-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 3884
     under a health care insurance plan, to the definitions of 'title                               
     insurance limited producer' and of other terms used in the title                               
     regulating the practice of the business of insurance, and to small                             
     employer health insurance; repealing the Small Employer Health                                 
     Reinsurance Association; making conforming amendments;                                         
     establishing a fund for the payment of Servicemembers' Group                                   
     Life Insurance premiums and providing for the payment of                                       
     Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance premiums; and providing                                   
     for an effective date."                                                                        
                                                                                                    
     (HCR 50 - title change resolution)                                                             
                                                                                                    
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CSSB 289(FIN) am H pass                                    
the House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                          
                                                                                                    
CSSB 289(FIN)am H--RECONSIDERATION                                                                  
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  40   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula,                                  
Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman,                                         
Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas,                                  
Weyhrauch, Wilson                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, CSSB 289(FIN) am H passed the House on reconsideration.                                     
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
CSSB 289(FIN) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for                                              
engrossment.